• Home
  • About
  • The Career
  • The Challenge
  • The Cause
  • The Prizes
  • The Teams
  • Register
  • Login
 
  • The Challenge
  • The Cause
  • Entry Basics
  • Entry Criteria
  • Judging Criteria
  • Prizes
  • Register
  • Meet the Teams

'account on us'

Team members:
Andrea Rosanes (Charles Sturt University) ,
Katy Luo (Charles Sturt University)

'account on us'
In order to vote for this submission, please install Flash. Click here to install Flash

Synopsis

SEVEN KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
MÉDECINS SANS FRONTIÉRES AUSTRALIA
By Andrea Rosanes & Katy Luo
Charles Sturt University

The report and power point presentation(contains voice narration) displays seven key performance indicators that will assist MSF Australia’s current and future development.
On the basis of the nature of the organisation as a non-operational sector of MSF International, we have developed the seven key performance indicators based on efficiency, human resources, independence & ethics, awareness and growth.

Seven KPI’s for MSF Australia:

- Efficiency
- As an international organisation, MSF aims to achieve the ‘80/20’ rule, which means 80% of donations is directly distributed to the programme activities and only 20% of funds distributed towards administration and fundraising costs.

- HR (Experience)
Staffing Experience–First time staff/ returning
– Total Numbers
– Ratio
Staff members are one of the key assets to increase organisation performance. Experienced staff can drive the organisation’s performance further by using the same amount of resources.

- HR (Skill Level)
– General medical staff v specialist staff
The staffing skill level is also an important KPI as it shows the proportion of skilled professional staff (i.e. Specialist surgeons) against the number of general medical staff (ie. General practitioners), as well as the number of volunteers that have limited skill and experience.

- Independence & Ethics
• La Mancha Agreement (Internal)
• International non-governmental organisations - Accountability charter (external)
These two governance charters provide bench marks for MSF Australia comply to various standards ranging from accountability, transparency, independence of the board, accounting and auditing standards, good governance and ethical fundraising to name a few.

- % Growth of donations
The growth rate can be measured and compared nationally and internationally. This will enable MSF Australia to compare its growth from year to year as well as internationally in order to evaluate its position in the organisation as a whole.

- Media Coverage
• The amount of media mentions or stories per month can be set as a benchmark as well as a goal to improve awareness within Australia.

- Impact on Community
• Promoting awareness can show donators where the money is going as it encourages individuals on a personalised basis - This creates donor satisfaction.


From a CA student’s point view, we believe these seven key performance indicators cover all the important areas for MSF Australia as a non-operational sector and support based unit.
We have used some of the existing guidelines, frameworks, bench marks and easily accessible ratios to create our seven key performance indicators, which we believe will help in MSF Australia’s realisation of its position compared to the other sectors of MSF international, and effectively assist in the improvement in its overall performance. We believe our seven key performance indicators will help assist MSF Australia to a brighter future.

Download Powerpoint Presentation
Download Word Document
If prompted, please "save" file before opening.
 
VIEWING 31 - 35 OF 35 page 1 | page 2 | page 3
Hi Sinead Latimer Lasic

Thank you for your kind words regarding our KPIs

As for you criticism, this is a CA student competition we see no problems with highlighting the fact that we are students of a CA accredited accounting degree. We think the high quality work that entrants within this competition have produced should be evidence of the work that students can do, so why hide the fact we are students?

Andrea & Katy :)
By Katy Luo on May 10 2008, 20:43
Hi Andrea & Katy,
Your report is excellent and shows that appropriate research has been done. One possible reason why your PowerPoint slides are not working is because the format is mainly for office 2007 which is not really suitable with other version of office. We really like your KPI related to HR.
Remarkable report

The Godfathers
By Ronny Ho Von on May 10 2008, 23:35
Hi Ronny Ho Von

Thank you for your time to read our report

We really appreciate it.

Andrea & Katy :)
By Katy Luo on May 11 2008, 22:47
Hi everyone:

We would like thank you for your support in this competition.

We really appreciate your comments and thank you for your time to read our powerpoint and report.

Andrea & Katy :)
By Katy Luo on May 11 2008, 22:56
Regarding carlos's comment on your recommendation that a growth in media leads to a decrease in donations:

I have a marketing degree and I agree with you (carlo), broad based (TV/Radio) is the most effective way to generate a return, no question. Companies would not justify its cost if it didn't.

Television advertising is the most effective and I'd consider it a great way to use powerful imagery (think world vision) to raise awareness of MSF as an organisation, its cause, its project, donation opportunities - all leading to donation funds.

I don't really think brand association has too much to do with it. Its more case of brand awareness (ie. knowing MSF exists)

To illustrate my point, think back to before this competition started. How many students competing had heard of World Vision vs how many had heard of Medecins Sans Frontiers. Probably more had heard of World Vision due to their marketing. Now extrapolate that Australia wide.

At the end of the day you can't donate to something that you don't know about. My recommendation would be to increase the level of media advertising.

Obviously you guys disagree, but can you confirm this.

Are you saying the cost of TV/broad media advertising will be greater than the benefits received through donations, based on the MSF classification as a charity and the motivations of its donors? If so do you have any non-anecdotal evidence to support?
By Sam Gray on May 11 2008, 23:50
VIEWING 31 - 35 OF 35 page 1 | page 2 | page 3

  • Home
  • About
  • The Career
  • The Challenge
  • The Cause
  • The Prizes
  • The Teams
  • Register
  • Login
  • Contact Us
  • © 2008. All rights reserved.
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy Policy