Comment to myself. Incase of you guys where wondering, i did this just not long ago, i actually totally forgot about it until today. bad huh? so i called it overnight insight....i thought it was cool. guess how many stars are in the picture....

MAN United Vs Barcelona, now taking bets!

Hi there,

Great effort for such a short time frame!

The SMART performance philosophy, we think, was good in analysing your KPIs.
We liked the fact that you highlighted the amount of donations in regards to the individual states with Australia. It would be interesting to see where the bulk of donations come from within the country, as they can be used to compare against other states. Management could then possibly take the necessary procedures to encourage more donations in a particular state for example, in order to increase the performance of collecting funds in Australia as a whole.

Again, good work.

Andrea & Katy

Hey!

Nice attractive PPT presentation, perhaps a little wordy at times, maybe you could have listed main points in the PPT and accompanied this with a more descriptive report?

Nevertheless, clearly outlined KPIs and well adjusted using the SMART philosopohy. I liked your inclusion of grahpic (graphs, statistics) to maintain the attention of the reader and provide a practical insight of your KPIs.

Which of your indicators addresses the independence and autonomy of MSF?

Including ways of measuring such KPIs increases the achievability of your suggestions.

Overall a job well done and good luck.

Thanks for your comment,

My approach, was set on qualitative measurements of MSF, at least the majority of it. With enough figures, or 'results', statistical technique, i believe is a very powerful tool. analysis can show many insights on an entitie's performance given the information we need.

In relation to Andrea and Kathy's comment, statistics to the tool we can look beyond the figures shown. I would say, looking upon total donations, we can analyse, the number of donors, averages, time frames, arrays to matching results on a national level. Statistical packages allow us to obtain more than the mentioned above, and henceforth, i believe numerous KPIs can be drawn from this prospective given this approach.

Hi Judge,

In response to your question,
'We are interested in your proposed KPI "Decrease assignment times by 5%, increase effectiveness by 3%". How would this be measured in practise, and do you think that there could be some risks associated with implementing this measure?'

In practise, this could be measured using counters, im sure, on a mission, MSF would know how long it spends on missions. As a KPI, being reducing assignment times, can be calculated using the initial, as a measure. We can look at other variables that can be causal to the reduction in assignment times, ie new innovations to methods and approach, and the linking of effiencies and effectiveness. That is, these can be another form of KPI. In this KPI, im looking at the link in time spent and effectiveness, implying a causal relationship that an increase in effectiveness would lead to a reduction in assignment times, cet par.

The reduction in assignment time, can be due to these factors mentioned, as well as others. The implication of this is, a aim in reduction of assignment times, effects can be lack of care, inadeqaute service, poor treatment, etc. In saying this, the KPI is more measuring effectiveness, implying that increased effectiveness leads to a decrease in assignment times. Figurative percentages are shown as an example of performance handling to be in line with the SMART philosophy or KPI measure.

Regards

Hi Tom,

Thanks for your comment.

Ideas and methods i mentioned in this report, i believe are good measures and ways to enhance every KPIs achievability. I really forgot about the challenge until it was the day for last submissions, i really would have looked into other measures and elaborate my KPIs with support documents, but time was against.

I think, even with most of the KPIs mentioned within other teams, there can be included, a statistical component that can be used in its measurement. I would have liked to have certainly looking more into statistical measures to strengthen the KPIs.

Hi Judge,

In response to your question,
'We are interested in your proposed KPI "Decrease assignment times by 5%, increase effectiveness by 3%". How would this be measured in practise, and do you think that there could be some risks associated with implementing this measure?'

In practise, this could be measured using counters, im sure, on a mission, MSF would know how long it spends on missions. As a KPI, being reducing assignment times, can be calculated using the initial, as a measure. We can look at other variables that can be causal to the reduction in assignment times, ie new innovations to methods and approach, and the linking of effiencies and effectiveness. That is, these can be another form of KPI. In this KPI, im looking at the link in time spent and effectiveness, implying a causal relationship that an increase in effectiveness would lead to a reduction in assignment times, cet par.

The reduction in assignment time, can be due to these factors mentioned, as well as others. The implication of this is, a aim in reduction of assignment times, effects can be lack of care, inadeqaute service, poor treatment, etc. In saying this, the KPI is more measuring effectiveness, implying that increased effectiveness leads to a decrease in assignment times. Figurative percentages are shown as an example of performance handling to be in line with the SMART philosophy or KPI measure.

Regards

Hi there,

Well done on the slides...

I particularly like how you included the potential of MSFA to expand to other countries...that is very foward looking which is important in any organisation.

Good luck...

Cheers
Joel